|
Rangefinder
Magazine
July 2003
A Few Thoughts on Portraiture by David A. Williams
“…in the nature of fine portraiture through
the ages, there was an imagined rustle of fabric, a sense of perfume—the
gentle brush past of long departed souls, and she was gone.”
There will
always be a market for portraits of us smiling back at an imaginary
ever-present audience, of us locked into a moment of happiness. Our
very nature as (sometimes) social animals decrees this. We leave
a record that is often powerful in the sense that it elicits a duplicate
response from the viewer.
A photographer friend of mine, Doug Spowart
M.Photog. FAIPP, collects antique traditional family portraits. His motivation
is as simple as
it is philanthropic. “Professional portrait photography has always
been expensive. The people loved and were once loved in return enough
to be recorded for posterity,” Doug says. “That I have this
precious image in my hands, this slice of time, means two things—that
the subjects have passed away, and yet they live on and continue to provide
an emotional connection with the viewer.”
In Australia, families
are photographed much less regularly than in the United States. This
is an unfortunate cultural difference—the Australian
family often seeing a visit to the photographer in similar terms as a
visit to the medieval dentist’s office.
My recent photography of
children, done in a documentary style, demonstrates to me the power and
duration of portraiture. What I have realized is
that I am not making photographs just for the parents of a child. Indeed,
I will not do a session that just involves the child on his or her own.
I
have come to understand that we also make images for that child when
he or she becomes an adult. When children look back at those images and
see themselves as they were, they are looking for their parents when
they were young—such is the power and value of portraiture. Sadly,
this is often realized too late, and with much regret.
Having just viewed
some of the portraits in the collection of the Gallery of New South Wales,
I am surprised at the number of portraits, which
by their very nature invite and absorb you into their gaze. These long-dead
subjects rarely smile or laugh at you, and yet they live behind the paint.
 |
 |
| “How do I love thee?” by David Anthony
Williams. |
 |
A
captivating portrait by 19th Century French artist Gustav Courtois of
a beautiful young woman in a Chinese dressing gown against a textured
gold background seduced me. I could imagine her laughter, her passion.
Who was she? What were her thoughts, attitudes and tastes? What life
did she have? How long did she live?
 |
 |
| “So you’re the new boy, Eh?” |
 |
So many questions… but then,
in the nature of fine portraiture through the ages, there was an imagined
rustle of fabric, a sense of
perfume—the gentle brush past of long departed souls, and she was
gone.
Allow time for personal work. Allow studio time to explore
that subject further. Resist the temptation to direct the subject; rather,
suggest
a feeling. Exploring subjects above and beyond the requirements of a
standard portrait directly positively affects and elevates the quality
of our work.
As I’m fond of quoting, “Our ability to produce
similar work of good standing is what makes us professionals. It doesn’t
make us artists.” “Repetition is the enemy of creativity.” That’s
why you have to allow yourself to push the envelope. You have to allow
yourself the time to be passionately involved in the images you make.
Whether you sell the image or not is completely irrelevant. Very few
situations in life allow you to get paid for study and learning—it’s
almost always the other way around.
Make portrait photographs that live.
The following pages
include notes on five award-winning images by David Williams from WPPI
2003.—Ed.
David Williams, in 1992, achieved the very rare distinction of Associateship
and Fellowship of the Royal Photographic Society of Great Britain (FRPS)
on the same day. In 2001, he was awarded the Accolade of Highest Photographic
Achievement (AHPA) from WPPI.
“My flying Heart”
Camera: Fuji FinePix S2
Pro on Tiff/4356, sharpen on, 200 ISO, standard everything else. Single
studio flash. Exposure: 1/125 af f/16. Lens used was a Sigma EX APO 70–200mm
f/2.8. Final print made through Epson Stylus Photo 1290 (U.S. model number
1280) printer at 1440 dpi, on English ‘Permajet’ Portrait
Classic 300 gsm paper.The subject is my niece at 18, a fresh beauty with
a quiet and trusting innocence. “
So you’re the new boy, Eh?”
This character represents a rather formidable and malevolent Dickensian
clerk. I tried to imagine being the small undernourished and maltreated
boy coming along for the job.
“
Deiter—Russia—1944”
The subject represents a once-proud World War II German Wermacht soldier
after the collapse of the Russian campaign. His clothing indicates he’s
now living “very rough.” The items in his hands suggest a
return to the basic necessity of staying alive.
“
Olé Señor”
Pictured is a friend, Penny, showing her wonderfully vibrant and vivacious
personality.
Technical Information
Camera: Fuji FinePix S2 on Tiff / 4356, sharpen on, 200 ISO, standard
everything else. A single studio flash was used. Exposure was about 1/125
at f/16. Lens was a Sigma EX APO 70–200mm f/2.8. Final print made
through an Epson Stylus Photo 1290 (U.S. model number 1280) at 1440 dpi,
on English ‘Permajet’ Portrait Classic 300 gsm paper.
“ How do I love thee?”
The specific intent of this image was to demonstrate the power of constructing
simple and elegant story-telling images using digital capture and Photoshop,
without resorting to many of the overblown and ultimately ugly special
effects.
Technical Information
Camera: Fuji FinePix S1 on High Jpeg / 3024, standard everything. Lenses
are Sigma EX DG 28mm f/1.8, and Sigma EX DG 24–70mm f/2.8. Both
lenses were used wide open. All images were made with existing daylight,
all shot during the normal process of the actual wedding. Final print
made on photographic paper through a Durst Lamda by ‘The Edge’ [lab]
in Melbourne, Australia.
|